:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, is rude)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, is rude)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cashier, is rude)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(clerk, is rude)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(clerk, is rude)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cashier, is rude)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(supervisor, is rude)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clerk, is rude)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pharmacist, is rude)