cleveland: is bad city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, ohio
Weight: 0.62
, team
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.57
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, miami
Weight: 0.36
, boston
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad city 1.00
is good city 0.96
is city 0.91
is worst city 0.85
has quality bad 0.76
be called forest city 0.75
is forest city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cleveland, is bad city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(miami, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(boston, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(miami, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(boston, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new york city, is city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new york city, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, is city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(boston, is city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(boston, is city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(miami, is city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(miami, is city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(boston, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(boston, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(miami, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(miami, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(cleveland, is bad city)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cleveland, is city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cleveland, is good city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cleveland, is worst city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cleveland, is forest city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cleveland, is worst city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cleveland, be called forest city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, be called forest city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cleveland, be called forest city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cleveland, be called forest city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cleveland, is city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is forest city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cleveland, is forest city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is forest city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cleveland, is good city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cleveland, is bad city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new york city, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philadelphia, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(boston, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(miami, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(miami, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(boston, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)