cleveland: is good city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, ohio
Weight: 0.62
, team
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.57
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, miami
Weight: 0.36
, boston
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good city 1.00
is bad city 0.96
is city 0.93
is worst city 0.82
is forest city 0.76
be called forest city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cleveland, is good city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(miami, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(boston, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is good city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new york city, is city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new york city, is city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, is city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(boston, is city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(boston, is city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(miami, is city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(miami, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cleveland, is good city)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cleveland, is city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cleveland, is city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cleveland, is worst city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, be called forest city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cleveland, be called forest city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cleveland, is forest city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is forest city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cleveland, be called forest city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is forest city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cleveland, is forest city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cleveland, is worst city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cleveland, be called forest city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cleveland, is good city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new york city, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philadelphia, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(boston, is city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(miami, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cleveland, is good city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)