cleveland: is worst city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, ohio
Weight: 0.62
, team
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.57
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, miami
Weight: 0.36
, boston
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is worst city 1.00
is bad city 0.85
is good city 0.82
is city 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cleveland, is worst city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(miami, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(boston, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new york city, is city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new york city, is city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, is city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(boston, is city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(boston, is city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(miami, is city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(miami, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cleveland, is worst city)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cleveland, is city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(cleveland, is bad city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cleveland, is bad city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cleveland, is good city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is good city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cleveland, is city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cleveland, is good city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is good city)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cleveland, is worst city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new york city, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philadelphia, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(boston, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(miami, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cleveland, is worst city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)