client: be with dementia at higher risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with dementia at higher risk 1.00
be with dementia at risk 0.98
be with dementia at higher risk for abuse 0.96
be with dementia at risk for abuse 0.94
be with dementia 0.92
has risk for infection 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, has risk for infection)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(client, has risk for infection)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, has risk for infection)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(client, has risk for infection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk)