client: is signs measured

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is signs measured 1.00
is vital signs measured 0.94
is signs 0.91
be monitored for signs 0.88
is vital signs 0.85
be monitored for signs of abuse 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(client, is signs measured)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(client, is signs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(client, is vital signs measured)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(client, be monitored for signs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(client, is vital signs measured)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(client, is signs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(client, is signs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(client, be monitored for signs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(client, is signs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, be monitored for signs of abuse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(client, is vital signs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(client, is vital signs measured)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(client, is vital signs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(client, is vital signs measured)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(client, be monitored for signs of abuse)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(client, be monitored for signs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(client, be monitored for signs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(client, is vital signs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(client, is vital signs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(client, be monitored for signs of abuse)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(client, be monitored for signs of abuse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(client, is signs measured)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(client, is signs measured)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(client, is signs measured)