client: leave financial advisors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
leave financial advisors 1.00
leave advisors 0.96
need financial statements 0.79
need financial information 0.78
use financial statements 0.78
be interested in financial statements 0.77
use financial statement analysis 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(creditor, be interested in financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(client, leave financial advisors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(client, leave financial advisors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creditor, use financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(client, leave financial advisors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(client, leave financial advisors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statements)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, need financial statements)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(creditor, be interested in financial statements)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need financial statements)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statements)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be interested in financial statements)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(owner, need financial statements)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(owner, need financial information)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in financial statements)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(client, leave financial advisors)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(creditor, be interested in financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(client, leave financial advisors)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creditor, use financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(client, leave financial advisors)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(client, leave financial advisors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(owner, need financial information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(owner, need financial information)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(owner, need financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(owner, need financial statements)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(owner, be interested in financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(owner, be interested in financial statements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(client, leave financial advisors)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(client, leave advisors)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(client, leave advisors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(client, leave advisors)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(client, leave advisors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(client, leave financial advisors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need financial statements)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statements)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(creditor, be interested in financial statements)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(owner, need financial information)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(owner, need financial statements)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in financial statements)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need financial statements)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statements)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(client, leave financial advisors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(creditor, be interested in financial statements)