:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cliff, is utah)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(boulder, is utah)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cliff, is utah)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cliff, is utah)
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cliff, is utah)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cliff, is morrison)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cliff, is utah)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cliff, is morrison)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cliff, is utah)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cliff, is utah)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cliff, is utah)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(boulder, is utah)