climber: reach top mount

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.48
, plant
Weight: 0.44
, woman
Weight: 0.43
, child
Weight: 0.43
Siblings ivy
Weight: 0.51
, sherpa
Weight: 0.49
, nasturtium
Weight: 0.47
, clematis
Weight: 0.40
, rider
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
reach top mount 1.00
die on mount everest 0.85
descend from mount everest 0.82
climb lhotse face 0.78
climb 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nasturtium, climb)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ivy, climb)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(clematis, climb)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nasturtium, climb)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(nasturtium, climb)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ivy, climb)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ivy, climb)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(clematis, climb)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(clematis, climb)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(climber, reach top mount)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(climber, die on mount everest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(climber, die on mount everest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(climber, die on mount everest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(climber, descend from mount everest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(climber, descend from mount everest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(climber, descend from mount everest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(climber, die on mount everest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(climber, climb)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(climber, climb)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(climber, climb)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb lhotse face)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(climber, descend from mount everest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(climber, reach top mount)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nasturtium, climb)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(clematis, climb)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climber, reach top mount)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ivy, climb)