climbing: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.47
, behavior
Weight: 0.46
, movement
Weight: 0.43
Siblings rock climbing
Weight: 0.33
, climb
Weight: 0.32
, jumping
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be dangerous 0.99
be everest dangerous 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(climb, be dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock climbing, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(climb, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(climb, be dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rock climbing, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(climbing, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(climbing, be dangerous)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(climbing, be dangerous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(climbing, be dangerous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(climbing, be everest dangerous)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(climbing, be dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(climbing, be everest dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(climbing, be everest dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(climbing, be everest dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(climbing, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(climbing, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(climb, be dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(climbing, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock climbing, is dangerous)