clipper: be at drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.48
, team
Weight: 0.48
, device
Weight: 0.47
, instrument
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nail clipper
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.33
, grinder
Weight: 0.32
, compass
Weight: 0.31
, razor blade
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drawer 1.00
be at desk drawer 0.94
be at dresser drawer 0.92
be at your desk 0.76
be at desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(clipper, be at drawer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, be at drawer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at drawer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nail clipper, be at drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at your desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at drawer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(nail clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nail clipper, be at drawer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at your desk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(clipper, be at drawer)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(clipper, be at dresser drawer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(clipper, be at dresser drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(clipper, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nail clipper, be at drawer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at your desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, be at drawer)