clipper: be at dresser drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.48
, team
Weight: 0.48
, device
Weight: 0.47
, instrument
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nail clipper
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.33
, grinder
Weight: 0.32
, compass
Weight: 0.31
, razor blade
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dresser drawer 1.00
be at drawer 0.92
be at desk drawer 0.89
be at bathroom cabinet 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(clipper, be at dresser drawer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, be at drawer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at drawer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nail clipper, be at drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(nail clipper, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nail clipper, be at drawer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(clipper, be at dresser drawer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at drawer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at drawer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(clipper, be at drawer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(clipper, be at drawer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(clipper, be at dresser drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nail clipper, be at drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, be at desk drawer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(clipper, be at dresser drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, be at drawer)