clipper: has quality service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.48
, programming language
Weight: 0.48
, team
Weight: 0.48
, device
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nail clipper
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.33
, pruning shears
Weight: 0.33
, cutter
Weight: 0.32
, trimmer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality service 1.00
has quality good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(clipper, has quality service)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(clipper, has quality service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(clipper, has quality service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(clipper, has quality service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nail clipper, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(clipper, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(clipper, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(clipper, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(clipper, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(clipper, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nail clipper, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(clipper, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)