clog: is review

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shoe
Weight: 0.59
, style
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.42
, issue
Weight: 0.42
Siblings loafer
Weight: 0.30
, stout
Weight: 0.30
, lace
Weight: 0.30
, flip flop
Weight: 0.30
, baroque
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is review 1.00
review 0.99
is reviews 0.83
reviews 0.82
is korean review 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(style, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(clog, is review)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(style, is korean review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(clog, is review)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(style, is review)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(style, is korean review)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(style, is korean review)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(style, is review)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(style, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(clog, is review)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(style, is korean review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(clog, is review)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(clog, is review)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(clog, review)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(clog, review)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(clog, review)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(clog, review)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(clog, is reviews)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(clog, reviews)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(clog, reviews)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(clog, is reviews)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(clog, reviews)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(clog, is reviews)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(clog, reviews)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(clog, is reviews)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clog, is review)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(clog, is review)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(style, is review)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(style, is korean review)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(style, is review)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(clog, is review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(style, is korean review)