cloning: be detrimental to group of organisms

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.60 , technology Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.58 , subject Weight: 0.55 , practice Weight: 0.55
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.33 , nanotechnology Weight: 0.32 , euthanasia Weight: 0.32 , hybridization Weight: 0.32 , ultrasound Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be detrimental to group of organisms	1.00
be detrimental to group	0.91
be detrimental	0.88
is harmful	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(technology, is harmful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(technology, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(technology, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(technology, is harmful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(ultrasound, is harmful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(cloning, is harmful)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(cloning, be detrimental to group)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(cloning, be detrimental)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(cloning, is harmful)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(cloning, be detrimental)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(cloning, is harmful)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(cloning, is harmful)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(cloning, be detrimental)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(technology, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(ultrasound, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(cloning, be detrimental to group of organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(technology, is harmful)