cloth: be at australia

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, necessity
Weight: 0.58
, tapestry
Weight: 0.57
, fabric
Weight: 0.57
, raw material
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bed sheet
Weight: 0.66
, handkerchief
Weight: 0.64
, pillow case
Weight: 0.63
, linen
Weight: 0.61
, flannel
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at australia 1.00
be at england 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cloth, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pillow case, be at england)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cloth, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pillow case, be at england)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(pillow case, be at england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cloth, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cloth, be at australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(cloth, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cloth, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cloth, be at australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cloth, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cloth, be at australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cloth, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pillow case, be at england)