clothing: lack of is hazard in sport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.60
, craft
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings lingerie
Weight: 0.59
, coat
Weight: 0.59
, tank top
Weight: 0.58
, swimsuit
Weight: 0.57
, skirt
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
lack of is hazard in sport 1.00
lack of is hazard 0.96
be important in sport 0.79
be in danger 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(craft, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(craft, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(craft, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(craft, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(clothing, be important in sport)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(clothing, be important in sport)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(clothing, be important in sport)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(clothing, be important in sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(craft, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(clothing, lack of is hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(craft, be in danger)