cms: be important to healthcare organizations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.52
, organization
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.47
, school district
Weight: 0.47
Siblings winnipeg
Weight: 0.30
, kingston
Weight: 0.30
, freebsd
Weight: 0.30
, siemens
Weight: 0.30
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to healthcare organizations 1.00
be important to hospitals 0.81
be important to providers 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cms, be important to hospitals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(cms, be important to providers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cms, be important to hospitals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cms, be important to providers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(cms, be important to hospitals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cms, be important to providers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cms, be important to hospitals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cms, be important to providers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)