cms: be important to providers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.52
, organization
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.47
, school district
Weight: 0.47
Siblings winnipeg
Weight: 0.30
, kingston
Weight: 0.30
, freebsd
Weight: 0.30
, siemens
Weight: 0.30
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to providers 1.00
be important to healthcare organizations 0.81
be important to hospitals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cms, be important to providers)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cms, be important to hospitals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(cms, be important to hospitals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cms, be important to hospitals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cms, be important to healthcare organizations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cms, be important to hospitals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cms, be important to providers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cms, be important to providers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cms, be important to providers)