cms: has state agency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.52
, organization
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.47
, school district
Weight: 0.47
Siblings winnipeg
Weight: 0.30
, kingston
Weight: 0.30
, freebsd
Weight: 0.30
, siemens
Weight: 0.30
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state agency 1.00
is federal agency 0.93
is powerful federal agency 0.90
is powerful agency 0.90
has state job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cms, has state agency)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cms, is federal agency)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cms, is powerful federal agency)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cms, is powerful federal agency)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cms, is powerful agency)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cms, is powerful agency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cms, is federal agency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cms, is powerful federal agency)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cms, is federal agency)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cms, is powerful agency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cms, is powerful federal agency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cms, is powerful agency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cms, is federal agency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cms, has state job)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cms, has state job)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cms, has state job)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cms, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cms, has state agency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cms, has state agency)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cms, has state agency)