cn tower: is strong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tower
Weight: 0.68
, attraction
Weight: 0.62
, building
Weight: 0.57
, landmark
Weight: 0.54
, structure
Weight: 0.53
Siblings eiffel tower
Weight: 0.36
, control tower
Weight: 0.35
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.33
, apartment building
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is strong 1.00
is weak 0.82
strong enough withstand 0.78
deal with strong winds 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(attraction, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cn tower, is strong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(attraction, is strong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(attraction, is strong)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, deal with strong winds)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, strong enough withstand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(attraction, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cn tower, is strong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(skyscraper, strong enough withstand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, strong enough withstand)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(skyscraper, deal with strong winds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, deal with strong winds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cn tower, is strong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, is strong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cn tower, is strong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(attraction, is strong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(skyscraper, strong enough withstand)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(skyscraper, deal with strong winds)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cn tower, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(attraction, is strong)