coastline: be around world under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, area
Weight: 0.53
, mountain range
Weight: 0.48
, issue
Weight: 0.48
Siblings shoreline
Weight: 0.35
, coast
Weight: 0.35
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.34
, falkland islands
Weight: 0.33
, beach
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be around world under threat 1.00
be under threat 0.93
be around world 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(coast, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coast, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(coast, be under threat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(coastline, be around world under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be under threat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(coastline, be under threat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be around world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(coastline, be under threat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(coastline, be around world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coastline, be under threat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(coastline, be around world)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(coastline, be around world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be around world under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(coastline, be around world under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be around world under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(coast, be under threat)