cobbler: be called cobblers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.71
, craftsman
Weight: 0.50
, trade
Weight: 0.49
, cake
Weight: 0.48
, project
Weight: 0.48
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, lemon curd
Weight: 0.36
, apple pie
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called cobblers 1.00
be called cobbler 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(dessert, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobblers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(dessert, be called cobbler)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be called cobbler)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(dessert, be called cobbler)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cobbler, be called cobblers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cobbler, be called cobblers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobbler)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cobbler, be called cobbler)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cobbler, be called cobbler)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobbler)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobblers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cobbler, be called cobblers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dessert, be called cobbler)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cobbler, be called cobblers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dessert, be called cobbler)