coca cola: be better at at mcdonald

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better at at mcdonald 1.00
be popular at mcdonald 0.90
be better than pepsi 0.80
play with mitch 0.76
is arnold palmer 0.76
be called arnold palmer 0.76
be more expensive than pepsi 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(drink, is arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drink, be called arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(drink, is arnold palmer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drink, is arnold palmer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(drink, is arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drink, be called arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drink, is arnold palmer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drink, is arnold palmer)