coca cola: be cheaper than water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than water 1.00
is more expensive 0.86
be more expensive than pepsi 0.83
is quicker 0.77
be better than white milk for recovery 0.77
be better than pepsi 0.76
is good cleaner 0.76
be more popular than pepsi 0.76
get then water 0.75
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(soft drink, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is quicker)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is quicker)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(soft drink, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(coca cola, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(soft drink, is quicker)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(soft drink, is quicker)