coca cola: be more popular than pepsi

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36
, apple juice
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than pepsi 1.00
be good than pepsi 0.93
be defined as pepsi cola 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(soft drink, be defined as pepsi cola)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be defined as pepsi cola)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be defined as pepsi cola)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(soft drink, be defined as pepsi cola)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be good than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coca cola, be good than pepsi)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good than pepsi)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(coca cola, be good than pepsi)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(soft drink, be defined as pepsi cola)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(soft drink, be defined as pepsi cola)