coca cola: be more successful than pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more successful than pepsi 1.00
be more popular than pepsi 0.94
be more expensive than pepsi 0.93
be better than pepsi 0.92
is successful 0.78
is more expensive 0.76
be popular at mcdonald 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is successful)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is successful)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is successful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(coca cola, is successful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)