coca cola: be popular at mcdonald

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular at mcdonald 1.00
be better at at mcdonald 0.90
be more popular than pepsi 0.79
be called arnold palmer 0.77
is arnold palmer 0.77
be illegal in cuba 0.76
be important to georgia 0.76
be free in las vegas 0.76
be more expensive than pepsi 0.75
be expensive in europe 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(drink, is arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drink, be called arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(drink, is arnold palmer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drink, is arnold palmer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(drink, is arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drink, be called arnold palmer)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coca cola, be illegal in cuba)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(coca cola, be illegal in cuba)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be important to georgia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(coca cola, be important to georgia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be illegal in cuba)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be important to georgia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be illegal in cuba)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be important to georgia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drink, is arnold palmer)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(drink, be called arnold palmer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drink, is arnold palmer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, be popular at mcdonald)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in europe)