cocker spaniel: has physical part paws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.80
, puppy
Weight: 0.70
, animal
Weight: 0.52
, medium
Weight: 0.38
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.42
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.42
, dachshund
Weight: 0.40
, small dog
Weight: 0.40
, poodle
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part paws 1.00
have big paws 0.93
lick paws 0.90
bite paws 0.88
has physical part ears 0.84
has physical part eyes 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(puppy, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(puppy, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(puppy, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(puppy, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(puppy, lick paws)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(puppy, lick paws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(puppy, has physical part eyes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(beagle, lick paws)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(small dog, lick paws)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(poodle, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(puppy, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(puppy, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(puppy, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(beagle, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beagle, lick paws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(small dog, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(small dog, lick paws)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(beagle, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(beagle, has physical part ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(poodle, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poodle, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(puppy, lick paws)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part eyes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beagle, lick paws)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(small dog, lick paws)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(beagle, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(poodle, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beagle, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(puppy, lick paws)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)