cocker spaniel: have big paws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.80
, puppy
Weight: 0.70
, animal
Weight: 0.52
, medium
Weight: 0.38
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.42
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.42
, dachshund
Weight: 0.40
, small dog
Weight: 0.40
, poodle
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big paws 1.00
lick paws 0.93
has physical part paws 0.93
bite paws 0.92
have big ears 0.83
have long ears 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(puppy, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(puppy, lick paws)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, have big ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(puppy, lick paws)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, have big ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(beagle, lick paws)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(small dog, lick paws)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have big ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(beagle, have big ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have long ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, have long ears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(puppy, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(beagle, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beagle, lick paws)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(small dog, lick paws)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(small dog, lick paws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(dachshund, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(dachshund, have big ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beagle, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(beagle, have big ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beagle, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beagle, have long ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(dachshund, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dachshund, have long ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, lick paws)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, bite paws)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part paws)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, bite paws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(puppy, lick paws)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beagle, lick paws)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(small dog, lick paws)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dachshund, have big ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dachshund, have long ears)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(beagle, have big ears)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(beagle, have long ears)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(puppy, lick paws)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cocker spaniel, have big paws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, have big ears)