cocktail: have stupid names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.71
, soft drink
Weight: 0.62
, beverage
Weight: 0.60
, drink
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gin
Weight: 0.60
, tonic
Weight: 0.56
, mimosa
Weight: 0.52
, vermouth
Weight: 0.47
, kamikaze
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
have stupid names 1.00
have rude names 0.88
have names 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cocktail, have stupid names)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cocktail, have names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cocktail, have rude names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cocktail, have rude names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cocktail, have names)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cocktail, have rude names)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cocktail, have names)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cocktail, have rude names)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cocktail, have names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cocktail, have stupid names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(cocktail, have stupid names)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cocktail, have stupid names)