coconut milk: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents milk
Weight: 0.80
, dairy product
Weight: 0.74
, fruit
Weight: 0.71
, coconut
Weight: 0.66
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.43
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.40
, powdered milk
Weight: 0.40
, skim milk
Weight: 0.38
, mango
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(milk, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(coconut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coconut milk, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(coconut, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(milk, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coconut, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(milk, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, taste bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(milk, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(coconut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(skim milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(skim milk, taste bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(skim milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(skim milk, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(coconut milk, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(coconut milk, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coconut milk, go bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(coconut milk, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coconut milk, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coconut, go bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(milk, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(skim milk, taste bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skim milk, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coconut, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(coconut milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(milk, go bad)