code: be important to industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents source code
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.61
, law
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.61
Siblings zip code
Weight: 0.80
, password
Weight: 0.66
, software
Weight: 0.65
, identifier
Weight: 0.62
, reference
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to industry 1.00
be important in business 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(law, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(code, be important to industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(law, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(law, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(law, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(code, be important to industry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(code, be important to industry)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(code, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(code, be important in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(code, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(code, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(code, be important to industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(code, be important to industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(law, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(code, be important to industry)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(law, be important in business)