cogitate: be used to try to solve thorny problem

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to try to solve thorny problem 1.00
be motivated by solve problem 0.89
be motivated by understand hard problem 0.80
causes get answer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cogitate, be motivated by solve problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cogitate, be motivated by understand hard problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cogitate, causes get answer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cogitate, be motivated by solve problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cogitate, be motivated by solve problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cogitate, be motivated by solve problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cogitate, causes get answer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cogitate, be motivated by understand hard problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cogitate, causes get answer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cogitate, be motivated by understand hard problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cogitate, be motivated by understand hard problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cogitate, causes get answer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cogitate, be used to try to solve thorny problem)