coil: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, magnetic field
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.58
, pattern
Weight: 0.55
Siblings thermistor
Weight: 0.34
, helix
Weight: 0.34
, rod
Weight: 0.33
, dipole
Weight: 0.33
, spline
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
affect taste 0.90
compare to good flavor 0.82
compare to good flavor build 0.79
go bad vape 0.79
go bad 0.79
compare to flavor 0.78
taste burnt 0.77
compare to flavor build 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rod, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rod, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rod, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(coil, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(coil, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(coil, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coil, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(coil, affect taste)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(coil, go bad vape)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(coil, go bad vape)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(coil, go bad vape)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(coil, go bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coil, go bad vape)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coil, compare to good flavor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor build)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coil, compare to flavor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coil, affect taste)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coil, compare to good flavor build)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(coil, compare to flavor)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coil, compare to flavor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(coil, compare to flavor build)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(coil, taste burnt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(coil, compare to flavor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(coil, taste burnt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(coil, compare to flavor build)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(coil, compare to flavor build)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(coil, affect taste)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(coil, taste burnt)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(coil, affect taste)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(coil, taste burnt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coil, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coil, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coil, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rod, go bad)