coke: be preferred over pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.67
, soda
Weight: 0.65
, soda pop
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings diet coke
Weight: 0.39
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred over pepsi 1.00
be than pepsi 0.89
be inherently better than pepsi 0.78
be preferred over coal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(coke, be preferred over pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coke, be than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coke, be than pepsi)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(coke, be than pepsi)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coke, be than pepsi)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(coke, be preferred over coal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(coke, be preferred over coal)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(coke, be preferred over coal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(coke, be preferred over coal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be preferred over pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coke, be preferred over pepsi)