colleague: be for good work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professor
Weight: 0.66
, teacher
Weight: 0.64
, mentor
Weight: 0.64
, researcher
Weight: 0.64
Siblings jim
Weight: 0.62
, steve
Weight: 0.57
, enrico fermi
Weight: 0.49
, scientist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for good work 1.00
be for work 0.93
be do better job 0.86
has quality good 0.82
has work helpful 0.82
be do job 0.82
be for job 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mentor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(colleague, be for good work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mentor, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mentor, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(steve, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mentor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(colleague, be for good work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steve, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(steve, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(colleague, be for good work)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(colleague, be for work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(colleague, be do job)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(colleague, be do better job)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(colleague, be for work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(colleague, be for work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(colleague, be do job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(colleague, be for job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(colleague, be for job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(colleague, be do job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(colleague, be do better job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(colleague, has work helpful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(colleague, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(colleague, be do better job)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(colleague, be for job)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(colleague, has work helpful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be do better job)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(colleague, has work helpful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has work helpful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(colleague, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(colleague, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be do job)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for good work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(colleague, be for good work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mentor, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(steve, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(colleague, be for good work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mentor, has quality good)