colleague: has state wellness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professor
Weight: 0.66
, teacher
Weight: 0.64
, mentor
Weight: 0.64
, researcher
Weight: 0.64
Siblings jim
Weight: 0.62
, steve
Weight: 0.57
, enrico fermi
Weight: 0.49
, scientist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state wellness 1.00
is wellness center 0.94
is wellness differential 0.86
has state health 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(colleague, has state wellness)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness differential)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness center)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(colleague, is wellness center)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(colleague, is wellness differential)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(colleague, is wellness differential)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(colleague, is wellness center)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(colleague, is wellness center)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(colleague, has state health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(colleague, has state health)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(colleague, has state health)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has state health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(colleague, is wellness differential)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has state wellness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(colleague, has state wellness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(colleague, has state wellness)