colleague: is is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professor
Weight: 0.66
, teacher
Weight: 0.64
, mentor
Weight: 0.64
, researcher
Weight: 0.64
Siblings jim
Weight: 0.62
, steve
Weight: 0.57
, enrico fermi
Weight: 0.49
, scientist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is paid 1.00
gets paid most 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(colleague, is is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(colleague, gets paid most)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(colleague, gets paid most)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(colleague, gets paid most)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(colleague, gets paid most)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(colleague, is is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is is paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(colleague, is is paid)