collection: be important in systematic research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collector
Weight: 0.65
, piece
Weight: 0.65
, poem
Weight: 0.62
, database
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings necklace
Weight: 0.32
, collage
Weight: 0.31
, earring
Weight: 0.31
, item
Weight: 0.31
, canvas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in systematic research 1.00
be important in research 0.86
is analysis 0.76
evaluation of be can ongoing process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(collection, be important in systematic research)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(collection, be important in systematic research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(process, is analysis)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(process, is analysis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(collection, be important in systematic research)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(collection, be important in systematic research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(collection, be important in systematic research)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(collection, be important in research)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(collection, be important in research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(collection, be important in research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(collection, be important in research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(collection, be important in systematic research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(process, is analysis)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(process, is analysis)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(collection, be important in systematic research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)