collection: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collector
Weight: 0.65
, piece
Weight: 0.65
, poem
Weight: 0.62
, database
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings necklace
Weight: 0.32
, collage
Weight: 0.31
, earring
Weight: 0.31
, item
Weight: 0.31
, canvas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
be bad for game 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(database, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(poem, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(piece, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(collector, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(collector, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(piece, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(poem, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(database, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(collector, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poem, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(piece, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(earring, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(collage, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(necklace, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(collector, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(database, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(poem, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(piece, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(necklace, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(necklace, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(collage, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(collage, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(earring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(earring, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(collection, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(collector, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(piece, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(poem, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(database, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(earring, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(necklace, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(collage, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(collector, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(piece, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(poem, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(collection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(database, has quality good)