collision: be addressed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.60
, car accident
Weight: 0.59
, operation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings crash
Weight: 0.35
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.34
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.33
, explosion
Weight: 0.32
, confrontation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be addressed 1.00
be is addressed 1.00
be is addressed in florida 0.83
be in wwi referred 0.75
be in wwi referred to 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(event, be in wwi referred)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(collision, be addressed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(event, be in wwi referred to)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(collision, be addressed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(event, be in wwi referred to)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(event, be in wwi referred)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(event, be in wwi referred to)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(event, be in wwi referred)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(event, be in wwi referred)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(collision, be addressed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(event, be in wwi referred to)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(collision, be addressed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(collision, be addressed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(collision, be addressed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(event, be in wwi referred to)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(event, be in wwi referred)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(event, be in wwi referred to)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(collision, be addressed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(event, be in wwi referred)