colony: be important to mercantilism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents territory
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.55
, settlement
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rhode island
Weight: 0.67
, new south wales
Weight: 0.62
, honey bee
Weight: 0.62
, virginia
Weight: 0.59
, falkland islands
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to mercantilism 1.00
be important in mercantilism 1.00
were important to mercantilism 0.99
were viewed in system of mercantilism 0.94
were important to european mercantilism 0.94
were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism 0.93
were important in mercantilist system 0.87
were important to mercantilist economy 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(colony, be important in mercantilism)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(colony, be important in mercantilism)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(colony, were important to european mercantilism)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilism)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to european mercantilism)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(colony, were important to european mercantilism)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(colony, were important to mercantilism)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(colony, were important in mercantilist system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(colony, be important in mercantilism)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(colony, be important in mercantilism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(colony, were important in mercantilist system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(colony, were important in mercantilist system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(colony, were important to mercantilism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(colony, were important to european mercantilism)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(colony, were important in mercantilist system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)