colony: were important to mercantilist economy

Property	Similarity
were important to mercantilist economy	1.00
were important in mercantilist system	0.97
were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism	0.89
were important to mercantilism	0.87
be important in mercantilism	0.86
be important to mercantilism	0.86
were viewed in system of mercantilism	0.85
were important to european mercantilism	0.83
were imporntant to merchantillist economy	0.80

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(colony, were important in mercantilist system)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(colony, were important in mercantilist system)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(colony, be important in mercantilism)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(colony, be important to mercantilism)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(colony, were important in mercantilist system)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(colony, be important in mercantilism)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(colony, were important to country with economic policy of mercantilism)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(colony, be important to mercantilism)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(colony, were imporntant to merchantillist economy)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilism)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(colony, were imporntant to merchantillist economy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(colony, were imporntant to merchantillist economy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to european mercantilism)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(colony, were important to european mercantilism)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(colony, were important to european mercantilism)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(colony, were important to mercantilism)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(colony, were viewed in system of mercantilism)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(colony, were important in mercantilist system)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(colony, be important in mercantilism)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(colony, be important to mercantilism)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(colony, were imporntant to merchantillist economy)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(colony, were important to european mercantilism)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(colony, were important to mercantilism)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(colony, be important in mercantilism)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(colony, be important to mercantilism)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilist economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(colony, were important to mercantilism)

Parents	territory Weight: 0.57 , place Weight: 0.55 , city Weight: 0.55 , settlement Weight: 0.53
Siblings	rhode island Weight: 0.67 , new south wales Weight: 0.62 , honey bee Weight: 0.62 , virginia Weight: 0.59 , falkland islands Weight: 0.56

colony: were important to mercantilist economy

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible