:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(colt, is horse)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(colt, is horse)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(colt, is horse)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(colt, be vs 45 colt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(colt, is horse)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(colt, is gelded)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(colt, is horse)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(colt, is gelded)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(colt, is horse)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(colt, is gelded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(colt, is horse)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(colt, is gelded)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(colt, is horse)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(colt, is horse)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings