columbus: is well known

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.63
, city
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.62
, ohio
Weight: 0.62
Siblings newport
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, springfield
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is well known 1.00
is more well known 0.97
is known 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(springfield, is well known)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(springfield, is known)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(springfield, is well known)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(springfield, is well known)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(springfield, is known)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(springfield, is known)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(columbus, is well known)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(columbus, is known)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(columbus, is more well known)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(columbus, is known)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(columbus, is known)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(columbus, is more well known)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(columbus, is more well known)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is more well known)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is known)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is well known)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(columbus, is well known)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(springfield, is known)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is well known)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(springfield, is well known)