comb: be at back of sofa

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, item
Weight: 0.52
, accessory
Weight: 0.52
Siblings pencil
Weight: 0.32
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.32
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.32
, fingernail
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at back of sofa 1.00
be lose under couch 0.83
be at drawer in bathroom 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be lose under couch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(comb, be at back of sofa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(thing, be lose under couch)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thing, be lose under couch)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be lose under couch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(comb, be at back of sofa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(comb, be at back of sofa)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(comb, be at drawer in bathroom)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(comb, be at drawer in bathroom)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(comb, be at drawer in bathroom)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(comb, be at drawer in bathroom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(comb, be at back of sofa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(comb, be at back of sofa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(thing, be lose under couch)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(comb, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(thing, be lose under couch)