combination: is possibly dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.59
Siblings switch
Weight: 0.59
, invention
Weight: 0.58
, monopoly
Weight: 0.56
, ampicillin
Weight: 0.52
, union jack
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
is possibly dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.91
is possible 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(option, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(combination, is possibly dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(option, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(option, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(union jack, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(option, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(monopoly, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is dangerous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(union jack, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(union jack, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(combination, is possibly dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(combination, is dangerous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(combination, is dangerous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(combination, is dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(combination, is possible)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(combination, is possible)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(combination, is possible)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(combination, is dangerous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(combination, is possibly dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(monopoly, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(union jack, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(combination, is possibly dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is dangerous)