combustion: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.63
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.62
, internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.59
, fuel
Weight: 0.58
Siblings diesel engine
Weight: 0.36
, steam engine
Weight: 0.36
, fermentation
Weight: 0.35
, electric motor
Weight: 0.34
, diesel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality change 0.86
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(internal combustion engine, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(internal combustion engine, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(internal combustion engine, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(diesel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(diesel engine, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(internal combustion engine, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(diesel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(diesel, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(diesel engine, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(diesel engine, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(combustion, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(combustion, has quality change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(combustion, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(combustion, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(combustion, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(internal combustion engine, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(diesel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(diesel engine, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(internal combustion engine, be bad for environment)