comedy: be central in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming
Weight: 0.62
, medium
Weight: 0.57
, style
Weight: 0.52
Siblings rock
Weight: 0.63
, groundhog day
Weight: 0.61
, bridesmaid
Weight: 0.60
, hot rod
Weight: 0.57
, dude
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be central in love 1.00
is central 0.89
is central political 0.80
be central racist 0.79
is central blocked 0.75
is central schedule off 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(comedy, be central in love)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(comedy, is central)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(comedy, be central racist)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(comedy, be central racist)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(comedy, is central)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(comedy, be central racist)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(comedy, be central racist)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(comedy, is central schedule off)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(comedy, is central)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(comedy, is central schedule off)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(comedy, is central schedule off)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(comedy, is central)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(comedy, is central schedule off)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(comedy, be central in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(comedy, be central in love)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(comedy, be central in love)